Skip to main content

Early Reading Motivation article



    
(portrait of my daughter, Tess, age 7, reading her favorite series Ivy and Bean)

        The article  "Me and My Reading Profile" by Marinek, Malloy, Gambrell, and Mazzoni (2015) discusses the value of assessing a young reader's motivation. It states that motivation plays as vital a role in reading achievement as other key skills (such as decoding and comprehension), yet motivation is rarely addressed in grades K-2. The authors go on to state that it is necessary to measure young students' interest in developmentally appropriate ways so that "literacy instruction can be designed with motivation in mind" (Marinak et. al. p. 52) and propose that they have created a useful tool with which to gauge students' interest in reading. Marinek et. al. (2015) state that "Without attention to reading motivation, some students may never reach their full reading potential" (p. 52).
       This article suggests that researchers have not considered young children capable of reporting their own motivation; however, if schools wait to address motivation, it may prove too late, as by third grade many children have begun to lose their motivation. Thus, Marinak et. al. (2015) developed the tool they call Me and My Reading Profile (MMRP) which they say "can be used by primary teachers to assess early reading motivation before significant declines can occur" (p. 53). This instrument consists of 20 multiple-choice questions, with half related to the student's "self-concept as a reader" and the other half "related to the value of reading" (p. 53). This test was given to 899 students in grades K-2 on the East Coast. It includes questions like "For me, learning to read is 1.) Easy  2.) Sort of hard  3.) Really hard" and "Do you have favorite books? 1.) Lots 2.) Some 3.) None" (p.54-55).
       Marinek et. al. (2015) state that the MMRP includes questions about aspects of reading that are socially mediated, such as reading aloud and discussing books with others. The authors believe that these social areas of literacy are as important for teachers to incorporate into their instruction as more traditional practices of phonics and so on, and they suggest that more research on literacy out loud is needed.
        The authors examine research-based suggestions for developing students' intrinsic motivation to read across the three sub-sets measure by MMRP: readers' self-concept, value of reading, and literacy out loud. In order to nurture a student's self-concept as a reader, Marinek et. al. (2015) state that teachers should give specific praise to individual students, and they give the following example: "'Matthew, I love that you used a word family to figure out that new word' is more instructionally supportive and motivating than 'Nice job, Matthew'" (p. 59). They also want teachers to promote the value of reading by allowing even the youngest readers to do authentic reading. To further promote the value of reading, they state that the youngest readers need to see their teachers (and the community at large) modeling a love of reading. Lastly, and perhaps most critically, Marinek et. al. challenge teachers to carefully incorporate literacy out loud techniques in their classroom instruction. They do not recommend, for instance, the common practice of pairing a strong reader with a weak reader for paired reading because this may harm the weaker reader's motivation; rather, it is best to pair readers of similar abilities (Martinek et. al. 2015). They suggest that all young students be given the opportunity to practice before they read aloud so as to preserve their motivation and confidence, and they further promote student choice in reading even in the youngest grades (Marinek et. al. 2015).
     Marinek et. al. (2015) close the article by encouraging action research in K-2 classrooms, stating that teachers should consider administering the MMRP to their students at the beginning of the year and then reassessing later in the year to measure reading motivation growth. It is clear that reader motivation is essential to helping students achieve their highest potential, and there is no reason to wait until third grade or beyond to begin to address the topic. Even kindergarteners have a sense of their motivation, and can be encouraged to strengthen their motivation in tandem with developing other reading skills such as phonemic awareness. Essentially, motivation itself is a reading skill that must be addressed through instructional techniques.


References
Marinak, B.A., Malloy, J.B., Gambrell, L. B., & Mazzoni, S.A. (2015). Me and My Reading Profile. Reading Teacher, 69(1), 51-62. doi: 10.1002/trtr.1362

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Reading Life

I learned to read in kindergarten, and I actually remember it rather well. I recall being dimly aware that we were in homogeneous reading groups and that mine was comprised of the best readers in the class; still, I was jealous of this kid Matt, who got to go to first grade during reading time. Always a striver, I wanted to know what I had to do to go to first grade for reading. . . turns out Matt had stayed back to work on his behavior, but he was a good reader. Eventually he skipped back up a grade. Meanwhile, I was in my reading circle in kindergarten using a basal reader featuring characters with names that seemed highly unusual to me, including "Rosa" and "Laddie" (the latter may have been the golden retriever who frolicked on the pages of that textbook). These  early memories of reading are definitely rooted in phonics instruction. I remember very little about how I was taught to comprehend --everything was decoding words and little else. We did seemingly

Article Review - “Poetry and Writing: Improving Fluency and Motivation For Students With Developmental Dyslexic Traits” by Dr. Benita Bruster

 The article I chose  was “Poetry and Writing:  Improving Fluency and Motivation For Students With Developmental Dyslexic Traits” by Dr. Benita Bruster,   Professor of Education and Interim Chair of the Department of Teaching and Learning at Austin Peay University in  Clarksville, Tennessee.  The article was based on Dr. Bruster’s work in a fourth grade ELA classroom with a small group of students who had been selected by their classroom teachers because they were struggling readers (Bruster, 2015).  In her article, Dr. Bruster explains that she was a volunteer who was “interested in literacy” (Bruster, 2015, p.93) and was approached by the classroom teacher to work with five boys during “their regular small group reading time”  (Bruster, 2015, p.93) for a period of nine weeks).  She goes on to explain that the boys selected for the intervention were identified as demonstrating characteristics of “developmental dyslexia”  (Bruster, 2015, p.94) based on “work samples supplied by the